From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jlicht@fsfe.org>
Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by ms12.migadu.com with LMTPS
	id 8MZDCkkLhWQk7gAATFOONw
	(envelope-from <jlicht@fsfe.org>)
	for <larch@inbox.kyleam.com>; Sun, 11 Jun 2023 01:46:17 +0200
Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS
	id sOhNCkkLhWQIMwAA9RJhRA
	(envelope-from <jlicht@fsfe.org>)
	for <larch@inbox.kyleam.com>; Sun, 11 Jun 2023 01:46:17 +0200
Received: from mail1.fsfe.org (mail1.fsfe.org [IPv6:2001:aa8:ffed:f5f3::151])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0851FF432
	for <piem@inbox.kyleam.com>; Sun, 11 Jun 2023 01:46:17 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jelle Licht <jlicht@fsfe.org>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fsfe.org; s=2021100501;
	t=1686440775;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=uHl76wV1i8gw69vYCWPrbGoF/bIXnIngMDjUEcUhBN0=;
	b=i/2I9Zc0pEerVYm1Z0S16nblZT7rkrF4fXs1gruRbFzLI5Lnt2pT3/cuyhuqExCgOppljm
	hUI57cTvziW60EObLWGQ3Y5NEvNLJ1qCBfzZH0cxaPkCaRuWb57BkTnNW2FqGS81HGUnl6
	RoBwZCdGQmxwdKNTKJbI624f/xGUOwE=
To: Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com>
Cc: piem@inbox.kyleam.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] New piem-debbugs integration
In-Reply-To: <874jne29hx.fsf@kyleam.com>
References: <874jne29hx.fsf@kyleam.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2023 01:46:14 +0200
Message-ID: <87zg56anjt.fsf@fsfe.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Migadu-Country: DE
X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN
X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com
X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.00
Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com;
	none
X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 0851FF432
X-Spam-Score: -4.00
X-TUID: OE9ssIcSbrhK

Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com> writes:

> jlicht@fsfe.org writes:
>
>> From: Jelle Licht <jlicht@fsfe.org>
>>
>> V3 of this series addresses most of the shortcomings identified in the
>> review of V2, with a point-by-point response still on its way.
>
> Thanks, v2 vs v3 range-diff included below.  Pushed (0a8def10) with one
> minor that I'll mention in a direct reply.

Thanks for the timely reviews and help!

I am already making use of the latest-and-greatest using the following
guix package expression, and everything I care about seems to work well.

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(define-public emacs-piem-next
  (let ((commit "0a8def1045ac083fb8c9d523cefed91155bfb593")
        (revision "0"))
    (package
      (inherit emacs-piem)
      (version (git-version (package-version emacs-piem) revision commit))
      (source (origin
              (method git-fetch)
              (uri (git-reference
                    (url "https://git.kyleam.com/piem")
                    (commit commit)))
              (file-name (git-file-name (package-name emacs-piem) version))
              (sha256
               (base32
                "1mwncvhrgqkh09bg7mzb2z66p2dnxd8bchcszs9y49cgvqllw9hp"))))
      (propagated-inputs
       (modify-inputs (package-propagated-inputs emacs-piem)
         (append emacs-debbugs))))))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

If you could CC me on the next release, that'd be wonderful; I can
propose an updated guix package expression (and make sure the info
manual is actually built/installed, which it is not currently).

- Jelle