From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms12 with LMTPS id SE5cA04yt2EuWgAAsNZ9tg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 11:45:18 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id iLv/OU0yt2H7NgAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 11:45:17 +0000 Received: from mout-p-103.mailbox.org (mout-p-103.mailbox.org [80.241.56.161]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40ABC34CD0 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 12:45:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:105:465:1:1:0]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-103.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4JCKSW4xm7zQjcK; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 12:45:15 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de From: Leo To: Sean Whitton , Kyle Meyer Cc: piem@inbox.kyleam.com, Xinglu Chen , sgo-software-discuss@chiark.greenend.org.uk, mailscripts@packages.debian.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Use notmuch-extract-patch if available In-Reply-To: References: <20211209204319.168897-1-sourcehut@relevant-information.com> <20211209204319.168897-2-sourcehut@relevant-information.com> <87mtl66ckv.fsf@kyleam.com> <87k0ga85yf.fsf@relevant-information.com> <87ilvt64rn.fsf@kyleam.com> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 12:45:09 +0100 Message-ID: <87wnk8k9tm.fsf@student-238-188.eduroam.uu.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kyleam.com; s=key1; t=1639395917; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=6FBKV/Vo1c9ql1fl1Gz6+kV30PgOmv1VWMBLoB8BNMQ=; b=vIDeh0Rxtsc9BiEUZ8Rp9pqBeMT+L6i7Kd/5aasqDNlUjId9wiBna5P4FKnsOmn7urlz8n 0mPNuJWXOQVo1oJNTn2rs7L81fWBY7pau2gW3O32oOGTTl9yIjOEYwT0T1H8AlLPcyBoxn UHNXJDkBZaV24m1KU/QoOaDOb9v0shcbeeSE5KL/Gs5NfgceiawUwSoZ5raj4IfIQ9024y SLFAXp+AAIUJCOP1DUM/eIO3uE4Sm5a+1gfr3KfytBakgNy1NaYkZ6rgiPmChbwBMsFxxW XRneh9HnvGSgQI/AqXNaiiuWJO/rsH7gabigzA6lhfLyjKlFQwEv57zlIr2WPA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=kyleam.com; t=1639395917; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=ChNLgLWC8e7GWOdl9tHDN8x9j1X/9/E07jzLZbHPdqi/SeEh9LO4tyjMKQD+C+WumvfMqt 2S9FB6OPA6QlILJfsxrdr4xCvNkFf11Bhg+mli4X1NOK64gwjx5sFGrRM5/ByykC61reAI 3HmYp0EXF5g8gPHRJYanpUdhbgcas2BzpbzVKv1NE4FUQH7mGR81WxnN2ugiXQ/ewjDuGx ErlduDbuAYomTa3NM+P2znU1uZgEH+DMLQmV/Yixny9Rvj6C4EknUaPC3ulsOB/uTjUB0P zKnS9PgPvHi9YEuHTn1HgZTquuoI9y+ZqQ2zgOxufbq7RpUt03B1BQEPmnhp/w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of sourcehut@relevant-information.com designates 80.241.56.161 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=sourcehut@relevant-information.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.24 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of sourcehut@relevant-information.com designates 80.241.56.161 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=sourcehut@relevant-information.com X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 40ABC34CD0 X-Spam-Score: -1.24 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: EJLWr29YCcjo Sean Whitton writes: > On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 01:45:48PM -0500, Kyle Meyer wrote: > >> Given this focus, I doubt mailscripts would want to pull in piem to use >> its functionality for applying patches. And at the same time, there >> doesn't seem to be quite enough meat or complexity in the patch >> application code that it'd be worth having an upstream library that both >> piem and mailscripts could depend on. > > I'm not sure but I *think* what Leo is suggesting is that piem be the > frontend and mailscripts' functionality gets used to apply patches ..? > Yeah, pretty much. Piem already feels pretty general with support for gnus, notmuch, b4, eww and elfeed so adding mailscripts doesn't feel like a big leap.