From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms12 with LMTPS id EBXlBPo8CWC3SgAAsNZ9tg (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 08:36:10 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id +AaBKvg8CWAwQgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 08:36:08 +0000 Received: from mail.yoctocell.xyz (h87-96-130-155.cust.a3fiber.se [87.96.130.155]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C650940149 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 08:36:05 +0000 (UTC) From: Xinglu Chen DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yoctocell.xyz; s=mail; t=1611218163; bh=kjdOQZ1AK7e1EhyoCLyVDy7U7c63F6i7kM03tflD/IQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=buDQyW/sZwO7KaKq39WxRto6JEa8yQQavtGDNbO8cRRECp0+OKUpM3MwHB9/TjbBJ R2LichbRbLPu30B5eEwAh5UGtwVokTPFugQ/6D7UJjB2O9JHVszzywbues8A5Dnl/F kd1Vrpu9HStmFzxurCb5CnG6dvAmU9Bsm2zXkEGg= To: Kyle Meyer Cc: piem@inbox.kyleam.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] gnus: Add piem-gnus-mid-to-thread In-Reply-To: <87im7rt3cc.fsf@kyleam.com> References: <796fb84d852f2a5adea1502db144dae1bdc4fe0c.1611132172.git.public@yoctocell.xyz> <87im7rt3cc.fsf@kyleam.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 09:36:03 +0100 Message-ID: <87turabsb0.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.00 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; none X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 8C650940149 X-Spam-Score: -4.00 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: z2j8teFQaKsY On Wed, Jan 20 2021, Kyle Meyer wrote: > I played around with this a bit, and all series seemed to get applied > without issues. I think interface-wise it'd be a bit nicer if we could > do this work behind the scenes without the user seeing any changes in > the layout/rendering of Gnus buffers, but I'm not sure that's really > feasible. I couldn't really find a way to do that, all the functions seem perform side effects instead of passing data around. > Mostly just thinking aloud: this could be rewritten without concat by > using (dolist ... (insert ...)), and it might eventually be worth > considering building the mbox up in a temporary buffer rather than as a > list of strings. But I think it's fine as is. > > Also, I've replaced the tabs with spaces. Sorry for not having set > indent-tabs-mode for the project. I've now done that in 9d60b3e. > > Pushed (c9228b9). > > Thank you! Thanks for applying!