From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:863f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms12 with LMTPS id eI9iO9obtWEGGQAAsNZ9tg (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2021 21:44:58 +0000 Received: from out1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:863f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id sIhJN9obtWE9AQAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2021 21:44:58 +0000 X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kyleam.com; s=key1; t=1639259098; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=jQH+jxzsFN3T+Sfqvr6Hq+rCY00kenrck+GsXggVPGo=; b=KMmT8BbSk8l1zF9k4pjcdOdF+LGsH8eOPIfYomN6K3PW6PsM7p6DCxYJOykYY72HpwpUYU PwH7PRF2xv0b6+rCs98pmAujDLyVWoAnxiaBEFM5zXVrdWmrwYUi6uAnlWb9ndRLxiQ3dD lriGZZhe1Sb8BGBxfjDWQ0fawi/XCceQzN/lE0XVdyN4jMVYz2opBdNqwlVOe94wfv6/lm WIvm4JZwU1Bbd+JHra4hty6TS4C2ZuG8b/0oPspN9cORKvU1/H09AqZJswq+IxigK3yydE c0FdL37QwXZrzo+WLsDMOB05rZSwswIP/D16QRj0cH3EWR4UngBH/38NlqFeLg== From: Kyle Meyer To: Leo Cc: piem@inbox.kyleam.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] piem-notmuch-am-ready-mbox: Add option to edit patches before applying them In-Reply-To: <87bl1oeqtw.fsf@relevant-information.com> References: <20211208160142.84085-1-sourcehut@relevant-information.com> <20211208160142.84085-2-sourcehut@relevant-information.com> <87r1amfnoa.fsf@kyleam.com> <87v8zynkhy.fsf@relevant-information.com> <87zgpaylus.fsf@hako.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <871r2lf3mv.fsf@kyleam.com> <87bl1oeqtw.fsf@relevant-information.com> Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 16:44:56 -0500 Message-ID: <87lf0q6ckn.fsf@kyleam.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-Migadu-Auth-User: kyle@kyleam.com X-TUID: hB52zNeJqOQF Leo writes: > Kyle Meyer writes: > [...] >> Is this topic something you'd like to flesh out and polish? (No worries >> if not.) > > I think the patch I sent should work well, at least it did with my > limited testing. I don't have much time to work on this either, but I > also don't think it's much work left to do: All right, then, I'll look forward to your patch. Thanks.