From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms12 with LMTPS id GODkJ+7QtWF0GgAAsNZ9tg (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 10:37:34 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id +G/YI+7QtWHvSAAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 10:37:34 +0000 Received: from mout-p-201.mailbox.org (mout-p-201.mailbox.org [80.241.56.171]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B77D373A5 for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 11:37:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp102.mailbox.org (smtp102.mailbox.org [80.241.60.233]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-201.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4JBh0p1gDWzQjxM; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 11:37:30 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de References: <20211209204319.168897-1-sourcehut@relevant-information.com> <20211209204319.168897-2-sourcehut@relevant-information.com> <87mtl66ckv.fsf@kyleam.com> From: Leo To: Kyle Meyer Cc: piem@inbox.kyleam.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Use notmuch-extract-patch if available Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 10:44:11 +0100 In-reply-to: <87mtl66ckv.fsf@kyleam.com> Message-ID: <87k0ga85yf.fsf@relevant-information.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.00 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; none X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 7B77D373A5 X-Spam-Score: -4.00 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: 75hMFBn+czrx Kyle Meyer writes: > > It's been a little while since I've looked over mailscripts, but I think > it's got a lot of neat functionality (and in general am excited to see > work in this space). I obviously decided to focus piem's patch > extraction functionality around b4, but I'm happy to consider some > support for notmuch-extract-patch if there are people that 1) want to > use notmuch-extract-patch and 2) for whatever reason, prefer to use piem > rather than mailscripts.el. > I've looked a bit at mailscripts.el and it serves as a thin wrapper around the perl scripts in the same repo. It has two features: 1) some light integration with debbugs and 2) apply the patch in this message/thread to a repo chosen by project.el/projectile. 2) is basically the same as piem except that it prompts the user for a project (every time). I feel like there is an opportunity here to reduce fragmentation and make piem the main interface to mailscripts. mailscripts.el is very short and just with this patch it supports half the functionality of mailscripts.el. This would of course require communication with the maintainers of mailscripts and a non-trivial amount of work. I'll get back to the comments on the patch later. -- ---Leo