From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:863f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms12 with LMTPS id 6LvsGU9StmGoIgAAsNZ9tg (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 19:49:35 +0000 Received: from out1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:863f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id k3rJFU9StmF/JwAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 19:49:35 +0000 X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kyleam.com; s=key1; t=1639338575; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8OE8L24UuI7LmGAuwdqTtJqA+W0DDEdTtwf3fPlJo0s=; b=wOuilschpZCdUy9uZKiDDOsR1fJhPHpNUdgcNlCJnXDkqsnlbgqqAnioSDLbDzoqvEOLC7 CiY/2RIlloEaUcl+abLXL5SIhQu2V33KwMC3XOhnflvPKJ7DtePKQktWLlvdk+fGTvLTRS xGh6W4f4Vj+DmMkyNQZ3ySCl+V8loZcirMP7zPzmEXJ1YNoxu+JGNIWT+PvTkCQ5LAD7kF 118sZXVAwc7ZL4fd1sqWiEy+M8zVMWeQ8qkktvYgOzSs6MrhAfVuwbztcPz3eMc03cJIKT HlAy62Pg+Khx1m1TRwvaO8sj5qxb6ZbIWUsJWSuwHmZi8AZwllz41nEF7aafhw== From: Kyle Meyer To: Sean Whitton Cc: Leo , piem@inbox.kyleam.com, Xinglu Chen , sgo-software-discuss@chiark.greenend.org.uk, mailscripts@packages.debian.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Use notmuch-extract-patch if available In-Reply-To: References: <20211209204319.168897-1-sourcehut@relevant-information.com> <20211209204319.168897-2-sourcehut@relevant-information.com> <87mtl66ckv.fsf@kyleam.com> <87k0ga85yf.fsf@relevant-information.com> <87ilvt64rn.fsf@kyleam.com> Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:49:32 -0500 Message-ID: <87bl1l61tf.fsf@kyleam.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-Migadu-Auth-User: kyle@kyleam.com X-TUID: sdjocFoEJdqo Sean Whitton writes: > On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 01:45:48PM -0500, Kyle Meyer wrote: [...] >> My view on it at this point is that piem and mailscripts have a >> different focus, and I don't think users having a few options in this >> area is a bad thing. > > We should probably go ahead and add links to each other in the READMEs? Sure, will do. And piem's documentation already points to mailscripts in a couple of spots: $ git grep mailscripts Documentation/piem.texi:@cindex mailscripts Documentation/piem.texi:checking out @url{https://git.spwhitton.name/mailscripts/,mailscripts}, Documentation/piem.texi:@cindex mailscripts Documentation/piem.texi:mailscripts, mentioned earlier in the manual (@pxref{Applying patches Documentation/piem.texi:@url{https://git.spwhitton.name/mailscripts/}