From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <kyle@kyleam.com>
Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by ms12 with LMTPS
	id TrKKBwN+OV+VJgAAsNZ9tg
	(envelope-from <kyle@kyleam.com>)
	for <larch@inbox.kyleam.com>; Sun, 16 Aug 2020 18:42:11 +0000
Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by mp1 with LMTPS
	id wIm9AgN+OV8kUQAAbx9fmQ
	(envelope-from <kyle@kyleam.com>)
	for <larch@inbox.kyleam.com>; Sun, 16 Aug 2020 18:42:11 +0000
Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (pb-smtp21.pobox.com [173.228.157.53])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0D6B940414
	for <piem@inbox.kyleam.com>; Sun, 16 Aug 2020 18:42:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
	by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 577F3F5791
	for <piem@inbox.kyleam.com>; Sun, 16 Aug 2020 14:42:06 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from kyle@kyleam.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to
	:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version
	:content-type; s=sasl; bh=GunFHdpk0Lxa7g91BUcNoqo8uFg=; b=PsnRFG
	rkMFVTSfwU6kcG0wlaGzIvp4sKcXqxquiszOWgVYDudyt0ieeEroo+RmpGZP2gFA
	cHAaUKIt+MRRgWyOpK8I9EsYk1b2plhBlv8L15VobOcXFMTlzLEnP7wQye4SRTWW
	Zl440bKfIniKIKZ8R3+e8d9jkXPNWvNLdSIOo=
Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
	by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44BB9F5790
	for <piem@inbox.kyleam.com>; Sun, 16 Aug 2020 14:42:06 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from kyle@kyleam.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=kyleam.com;
 h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=uwUX3rpP6wGQXnMNWvzOtucR1vU8brLrZ/lBscUMDmA=; b=uTKyjU8ZWIQSGFfYS9ZNUxOescfGOiG8tbbq68QDcL4PJPLRysXdDKRDmKUxENjHr7N6OE4q9x3Z41CnLOJQiVSTqVPRrddx/GorRpbJ7Wfj0mn/7xDItcvixnJjmyERAX3BmeDUTFsZtpuAcJ+ABafzyRxcYcFJIh3x/+fsoqs=
Received: from localhost (unknown [45.33.91.115])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A7538F578F
	for <piem@inbox.kyleam.com>; Sun, 16 Aug 2020 14:42:03 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from kyle@kyleam.com)
From: Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com>
To: piem@inbox.kyleam.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] piem-inbox-coderepo-maybe-read: Include current projectile project
In-Reply-To: <20200816165431.18195-1-kyle@kyleam.com>
References: <20200816165431.18195-1-kyle@kyleam.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2020 14:42:01 -0400
Message-ID: <877dty4eme.fsf@kyleam.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Pobox-Relay-ID:
 2D83D3A0-DFF0-11EA-858C-843F439F7C89-24757444!pb-smtp21.pobox.com
X-Scanner: scn0
Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com;
	dkim=pass header.d=pobox.com header.s=sasl header.b=PsnRFG r;
	dkim=pass header.d=kyleam.com header.s=mesmtp header.b=uTKyjU8Z;
	dmarc=none;
	spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of kyle@kyleam.com designates 173.228.157.53 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kyle@kyleam.com
X-Spam-Score: -1.00
X-TUID: A+PX0bINeXkC

Kyle Meyer writes:

> diff --git a/piem.el b/piem.el
> index 6a3c2b3..941b7d7 100644
> --- a/piem.el
> +++ b/piem.el
> @@ -293,10 +293,13 @@ (defun piem-inbox-url ()
>  (defun piem-inbox-coderepo-maybe-read ()
>    "Like `piem-inbox-coderepo', but fall back to reading the repo."
>    (or (piem-inbox-coderepo)
> -      (and (fboundp 'projectile-relevant-known-projects)
> +      (and (bound-and-true-p projectile-known-projects)
>             (completing-read
>              "Project: "
> -            (projectile-relevant-known-projects)))
> +            projectile-known-projects nil t nil nil

This is sneaking in a 'nil => t' change for DEFAULT.  I think that makes
sense, but it should be done separately.

And looking at this again, there are a few other aspects of
piem-inbox-coderepo-maybe-read that can be improved...