Hi Kyle, just getting back to this now. Kyle Meyer writes: > Liam Hupfer writes: >> I noticed some messages involving debbugs end up with “via ” >> in the From header, but not others. > > My understanding is that this From rewriting is due to how the admins > have configured Mailman. > > > > Here’s a previous discussion related to this on guix-devel: > > > >> As far as I can tell, these rewritten From headers don’t show up in >> the archives at lists.gnu.org or debbugs.gnu.org. > > I don’t know what the underlying setup is there, but my guess is that > those services get the messages before the rewrite. yhetil.org receives > messages as any regular list subscriber would. > > If you look through other archives (e.g., > ), you’ll spot some > “via” senders. Yup, I see them on emacs-devel as well. I think you’re exactly right about all of this (as well as the bit about different configurations (no DKIM) likely causing the differing behavior given a particular sender). I did some more digging and found that Konstantin Ryabitsev’s [Subspace mailing list server announcement] discusses appeasing DMARC. He argues that mailing lists shouldn’t have to munge the From header assuming they set the envelope-from address to the list domain and don’t fiddle with any DKIM-signed content. I’m inclined to take the kernel.org list administrator at his word on the subject. So I guess I would have to convince the Mailman 2 maintainers to expose this DMARC mitigation policy (or lack thereof) as an option, and then convince the GNU sysadmins to upgrade. No idea how feasible that is. For now, I set `p=none' in my DMARC record. Not ideal, but I don’t think I’m at much risk of impersonation anyway. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction! —Liam [Subspace mailing list server announcement]